Huawei P30 Pro: Good Video Shooter?
The Huawei have been pushing the limits of smartphone camera technology in recent years, accelerating their phones up the DxOMark league tables. DxOMark have positioned themselves as the leading source of independent image quality measurements and ratings for smartphones, cameras and lenses. So their rating carry influence when people are considering their next smartphone.
Their league table rates and ranks the photo and video taking abilities of all major smartphones. Huawei now occupy the top 3 places. However, the final score is a combination of stills capability and video shooting capability combined. For smartphone filmmakers, we are more interested in the video side of things.
Key specs:
- Triple-camera setup
- Primary: 40Mp, 1/1.7-inch quad RYYB sensor; f/1.6-aperture lens, OIS, 27mm-equivalent focal length
- Tele: 8Mp sensor, folded optics with f/3.4 aperture lens, OIS, 125mm-equivalent focal length
- 20Mp super-wide-angle with f/2.2-aperture, 16mm-equivalent lens
- PDAF/Time-of-flight (ToF) autofocus
- LED flash
5X Periscope Zoom
The P30 Pro packs some impressive camera technology, with a 5x periscope zoom camera being one of the biggest upgrades. These changes have put the device in the number one spot on DxOMark with a score of 122.
“The laws of physics make it difficult to fit a longer zoom lens into a thin smartphone body. Even using smaller-than-usual image sensors and clever lens design, manufacturers have only managed so far to achieve 2 or 3x optical zoom factors in conventional high-end smartphones. For the P30 Pro, Huawei uses folded optics to overcome this limitation.” DxOMark.
Huawei P30 Pro – Video
DxOMark scores the P30 Pro a healthy 97 for video, which puts it in 5th position – 1 point less than the P20 Pro. The overall video score is derived from a number of sub-scores: Exposure (85), Color (86), Autofocus (98), Texture (58), Noise (77), Artifacts (85), and Stabilization (94).
If you are intending on using the phone in auto mode, there are some interesting features.
The P30 Pro uses H.264 encoding and records video at 60 frames per second in good light. In low light conditions, when slower shutter speeds are required, the camera switches back to the standard 30 frames per second. Whereas the Pixel 3 record at intermediate frame rates, the Huawei shoots at either 30 or 60 fps only.
“The camera is capable of exposing video scenes well down to impressively low light levels.” DxOMark
But DxOMark say their testers “observed local tone mapping instabilities in most videos, with the brightness of some image areas changing for no obvious reason”. This includes some white balance instabilities and stepping when the system is adapting to a change in illumination.
The autofocus is accurate and quick to react, whilst the subject tracking is also very good.
Something which has been a problem with previous Huawei smartphones is a loss of detail in low light and the P30 Pro suffers from the same issue. There’s even some noise visible in bright light, as well as low light conditions.
DxOMark video test:
This is a pan shot taken by the DxOMark testers. The movement is not as smooth as you would want, with the image seeming to judder slight during a pan. My guess is that this is down to the inbuilt image stabilisation.
For still photography, this stabilisation is perfect. But when you are moving the camera, problems arise.
There seems to be less of a problem in the next test – a tracking shot. However, I think the inbuilt stabilisation causes problems again towards the end of the shot. Although DxOMark say on of the flaws of the phone is that “frame rate changes are noticeable in panning videos”.
I’m not convinced, as I’ve had bad experiences with inbuilt stabilisation in phones when shooting video. I’d like to see a test with inbuilt stabilisation turned off.
However DxOMark say: “Video image stabilization on the P30 Pro is one of the best we have seen, thanks to an efficient combination of optical and electronic image stabilization.”
Uhm.. ok. Well anyway, if you are serious about shooting video turn the inbuilt stabilisation off and use other methods such as a gimbal.
So summing up, the Huawei certainly shoots nice video. But with strong noise in low-light videos and some exposure and white balance instabilities, I would not put this phone as first choice for smartphone filmmakers.
Read Next: The official Mobile Motion Kit List.
Eager to learn more?
Join our weekly newsletter featuring inspiring stories, no-budget filmmaking tips and comprehensive equipment reviews to help you turn your film projects into reality!
Simon Horrocks
Simon Horrocks is a screenwriter & filmmaker. His debut feature THIRD CONTACT was shot on a consumer camcorder and premiered at the BFI IMAX in 2013. His shot-on-smartphones sci-fi series SILENT EYE featured on Amazon Prime. He now runs a popular Patreon page which offers online courses for beginners, customised tips and more: www.patreon.com/SilentEye
Hi Simon, thanks for your review on the P30 Pro, a very interesting read. I’ve been an iPhone user for the last 10 years, currently on an iPhone SE. However, I’m really interested in the upcoming Sony Xperia 1 and it’s exciting features for film making. I had considered the P30 Pro as an alternative as it’s already available to order, but your review has made me think otherwise. I’ll patiently wait for the reviews when the Xperia 1 is released!
Thanks for your feedback Jon! Glad the article was useful.
They’re certainly great phones for stills but not quite the best for video.
For photos it’s ok, if you like the instagram fake look, but for videos it’s pretty god damn bad. Worst than the P20 Pro. And that phone was not good for video.
Thanks for this, Simon! Wss thinkimg of getting the p30 but this helped make the decision. Which video cameras on smartphones do you think are better, in your opinion.
hi Helena! I would say the iPhone is still the best choice. But you could also look at the Xperia 1 or 5. Or Samsung S range. Check out my post here.
Dxomark is NOT independent. They do consultation works. And anywhere they are involved with a product, their tests are not independent for obvious reasons.
DXO mark are consultants. That business is not separate to the review. ALL REVIEWERS should ignore DXOmark, it’s completely biased.
The huawei video is HORRENDOUS for a flagship priced phone. The kirin 980 is not a capable cpu/gpu when compared to other flagship grade phones.
Don’t get me wrong, it’s a good phone. But it’s WAY overrated *100.
Hy, I’m a filmmaker and I’m planning to do a long trip. I would like to get a phone that let me shoot some good stuff without carrying a big camera with its own lenses and all this kind of stuff that normally people bring with them. I really believe that If I have a phone with an amazing camera I can get good results and I would have a better life without carrying some heavy bags.
So I have lots of doubts about what phone I should buy (huawei p30 pro, Iphone xr, iphone 11, google pixel, samsung s10+….). What phone would you recommend to me?
Thanksss!
for video, my personal belief is that iPhone or Samsung are still the best
indeed iphone is the best option, but after it… what model of Samsung do you mean?! thanks!
whichever one you can afford 😉 but the Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G is said to be excellent for video
Hey
I’m planing to upgrade my old Sony xperia z5 to a new phone. And p30 pro looks nice. Everything is okey, but Im worrying about the video recording. I tried to record some videos in shop, but the quality not so good. Sometimes looks like my old z5 records better than p30 pro ;D . So the question would be, is p30 pro camera really records terrible ? Im filming very rarely and only in 1080p60fps.
I think the P30 doesn’t record video so well in low light
Actually I’ve recently bought a P30 and also see the stabilization issues during video recording. Why don’t they add an option to disable it? I have an LG G4 and it does even better stabilization – including after zooming in. It is sad seeing that in a high-tech phone.
Sorry to hear that. Yes it’s a shame, after the phone got so many positive reviews for its camera