5 Steps To Becoming A Self-Sufficient Filmmaker and a Career in Film
Everyone has their own path, this is mine…
I wanted a career in film (as a film director, if course) when I was about 7 years old. I have some school diaries from the time. There’s a drawing of a (standard 8mm) camera on a tripod my dad bought me. I wrote the synopsis of films I’d seen at the cinema (ie: from memory).
One film was The Snowball Express. Over a the next few weeks I wrote out the plot-line of this film, as I remembered it. So it must have really stuck with me. This was in the 1970s, so no chance I could stream it or check the DVD to refresh my memory.
Later, at art college, I bought myself a Super 8mm camera and shot a couple of shorts. I never made it to film school, but a teacher suggested 2 options: redo the foundation course, or try to get into the film industry from the bottom, as a runner or something similar. Out of total fear and lack of self-esteem, I tried neither. Instead, I became a music engineer/programmer for 20 years and wrote screenplays in my spare time.
As a writer, I had an agent in L.A., optioned a few scripts, had meetings with the UK Film Council (now merged with the BFI) but nothing got off the ground.
1. Stop trying to be successful
In my early 40s, I was diagnosed with depression. This led to me “re-inventing” myself. I stood back, looked at why I was doing so many self-defeating things and realised it was nothing but fear preventing me from making films.
I also made a conscious decision to stop trying to be ‘successful’… Uhh, what?
Well, I changed my idea of what success was. My filmmaking career took an individual different path. Why should your personal success be judged by other people’s’ standards?
I think many of us want to appear successful to others. And therefore we try to make our achievements impressive; we want to reach goals which will impress other people.
In other words, we are living for surface values.
I decided my idea of success was to simply make films, the way I wanted to, no matter how.
What does Steven Spielberg do? He makes films. What do I do? I make films. So what’s the difference? Currently, about $3.9 billion. But wealth and the glory aside, we’re both doing what we love doing.
Well, I was never motivated by money, anyway. Glory, maybe. But I’d grown out of that. So, by my own terms, I am as successful as Spielberg. The great realisation was that I didn’t need to strive to be something I wasn’t – I was already there.
And I knew I shouldn’t wait for someone to fund my film. So I wrote a feature script called Third Contact, bought a camcorder, invited some people to help out and started filming.
2. Learn by doing
I never went to film school. Learning things the academic way has never worked for me. I can’t spend days writing essays about film to learn how to make a film. Also, I have a bit of rebellious streak. If someone starts telling me “you have to do it this way” my mind immediately asks “why?” and starts thinking about alternative methods. This doesn’t really go down too well at school.
When I came to shoot Third Contact, I hadn’t operated a camera for filmmaking since my 8mm days. At first, I had no idea what shots I needed that would cut together well to make a scene. I was shooting my debut feature film, winging it, but trusting I my visual and artistic instincts.
I shot loads and loads of footage, thinking I would have so much covered I could eventually make something of it in the edit.
As the shoot went on (over a year), editing as I went along, I learned to be more efficient. I learned how to shoot a film. Third Contact was my film school, really. It cost me £4000 and I by the end I had directed a feature which made it to a big film festival in Germany. How many film schools can deliver that for that price?
There wasn’t much in the way of tutorials then. But more recently, especially for CGI work, I have spent hours watching tutorials people have kindly put up online. YouTube, despite a tendency to narrow people’s taste, is a great resource for learning.
I really believe that filmmaking is like any other art – you learn by doing it, not by studying it (certainly the doing is essential, whereas the studying is optional). You don’t learn to swim by reading a book about swimming. You just have to get in and splash about until you get some skills.
I also believe the more you learn by doing, the more your own voice will emerge in your work.
3. The camera that suits you
Whatever you shoot on, there are compromises and limitations. What suits you? What suits your story?
When they have these comparison videos on YouTube between an iPhone X and a Arri Alexa, they only compare the image quality (which of course the phone is always going to lose). What we don’t see is someone trying to spontaneously run onto a train, filming without permission, holding a heavy Arri set-up, with legs, lights, lenses and a 6 person sound and camera crew. In that situation, the smartphone wins by a mile.
Ask yourself: “Is my dependence on this camera stopping me making my film?” or “Is it stopping me making my film the way I want to make it?”
I could write a book on my experiences trying to make low budget films, shooting on 16mm or professional cameras. When we shot Kosmos, we had a camera crew, with a big truck full of equipment (that was the DoPs bare minimum). Although it feels like you’re making a “proper” movie, for me it can feel like wading through deep mud.
Before I made Third Contact, I remember watching David Lynch talk about making Inland Empire. He explained how liberating it was using a small digital camera. How he enjoyed shooting without having to explain everything to a DoP. And watching the film I thought, ‘this is very creative’. It’s pure Lynch. And I’d rather watch a film by someone as creative as him using a SD camera, than a film by someone less imaginative with all the kit and 50 crew.
4. Other Equipment
For sound, I used a Sennheiser 416 microphone. It was the most expensive thing I bought for making Third Contact. But I had experience as a sound engineer and sound recordist, so I understood the benefit of good audio quality.
Recording audio works differently to recording image, in filmmaking. With the image, you can be expressive. You can experiment to achieve different things. With audio, it’s much less about how you record it, but how you design the sound in post – that’s actually where the expression comes in. Therefore, you want the cleanest sound possible on location.
The only Røde equipment I used was a boom pole and mic mount. With these things you can cut the price and they still do the job. I used an H4n Zoom, which I also bought for making Third Contact (so it’s lasted me almost 10 years, so far).
Some extras I recently purchased, purely for smartphone filmmaking, were the Zhiyun Smooth-Q gimbal and the Moondog Labs Anamorphic lens adaptor (with a 37mm clip I purchased separately). I used 3 x £1 coins stuck on with Blu Tack as a counterweight for the extra weight of the lens.
Also from Third Contact, I have a small redhead lamp. A friend found it in the back of a cupboard at the BBC. They were throwing it out, so I took it and bought some legs for it (£25).
5. Amazon and YouTube
Amazon have opened up their video platform, so they stand somewhere between Netflix and YouTube. Both Third Contact and Kosmos are on YouTube and Amazon. Since Amazon reduced their rates films with lower viewing figures, I find I make a little more money from YouTube.
On the plus side, both platforms have huge numbers of users. On the down side, they are swamped by content, because they are relatively easy to get your work onto. Which means they know they only have to pay you – the independent micro-budget filmmaker – the bare minimum.
Getting your work out into the world is now easier than ever. There is a massive, content consuming audience. Google (YouTube), Netflix, Facebook and Amazon are still the leading platforms for video, and their algorithms are tuned to get the most popular content in front of most of the people (whether they like it or not).
These algorithms do seem to reward quantity over quality – so that is a major shift in the way we are receiving art and entertainment such as film. To the point where even Oscar-winning directors such as Soderbergh are exploring ways to produce films faster.
Perhaps there’s also a balance between the two we can try to achieve. Is there a way to make the production process faster whilst keeping the soul of your story?
Producing and distributing your films, as I have done, certainly isn’t the only or the best way, but it is a way. If you are stuck, thinking about making films, waiting for someone to come along and make everything happen for you, a filmmaker has some advice…
“The cavalry isn’t coming.” – Mark Duplass
Eager to learn more?
Join our weekly newsletter featuring inspiring stories, no-budget filmmaking tips and comprehensive equipment reviews to help you turn your film projects into reality!
Simon Horrocks
Simon Horrocks is a screenwriter & filmmaker. His debut feature THIRD CONTACT was shot on a consumer camcorder and premiered at the BFI IMAX in 2013. His shot-on-smartphones sci-fi series SILENT EYE featured on Amazon Prime. He now runs a popular Patreon page which offers online courses for beginners, customised tips and more: www.patreon.com/SilentEye
This article could have been written by myself! …except for the depression, making a feature for £4000, not going to film school and that I used a DJI osmo mobile instead of a Zhiyun Smooth-Q, but with a blue tacked 2 pence piece to balance my Moondog lens!
I think there are many of us out there with similar paths trodden, similar struggles and frustrations, who despite the odds, still want to make films. I’m pretty resilient about passionately pursuing my dreams, but having reached 46 years-old, I do now get this external niggle that prods me, whispers in my ear “You’re too old, it’s too late, you had your chance, grow up and get a proper career.” It’s hard to ignore, but despite the emotional struggle, I know it’s not real and I’m learning to ignore it. I’ve always been a black sheep, never wanted to conform and so why should I now.
Unlike you I did go to film school and I would argue that it was well worth the money, experience and debt. There’s a big difference between ‘film school’ and ‘media studies’. The latter is mostly film theory (and nothing to do with filmmaking). The former however is almost 100% practical and in my experience a highly valuable experience.
After University I worked in the feature film industry as a runner/assistant. After a few years I was getting itchy feet. I was aware I hadn’t made a short film for a while and that my showreel was already out of date. If I wanted to become a film director I needed to make more films fast – but how?
My three Uni short films had cost me about three grand each, but precarious low-end freelance film work didn’t allow me any opportunities to save. Statistically I knew Lottery funding through the UK Film Council was almost as unlikely as winning the lottery itself (and takes sooo long from application to festival screening for just one short). So I decided two better options were to apply to the NFTS’s Fiction Direction MA and to Big Brother 2 (I figured I could make several big shorts or one low-budget feature for the £70,000 prize for winning Big Brother). I got interviews for both. Fortunately I got rejected by Big Brother, but accepted into the NFTS.
I had to pay for my first-year fees (minus £1000 donation from a plea to Brian Henson), but managed to get official industry sponsorship for my second year through BBH agency. The school gave me access to some of the best up-and-coming international filmmakers, amazing facilities, mentoring from Stephen Frears and a proper sound stage where you could build your own sets!
We were allowed to build sets for two NFTS film projects and I didn’t hold back on either of them. The first was a bombed out WWII German train station and the second a Dickensian fairytale roof top (and children’s bedroom). I could have never have afforded to make such ambitious short films outside of the school or so quickly (four shorts in two years). The latter Dickensian set was for my graduation film The Happiness Thief which allowed me to make the kind of film that I want to make in the real world. The film was selected in competition at Cannes, opened many doors and got me an established agent at Curtis Brown.
Unfortunately despite all this success and ‘almost’ getting my first feature film off the ground several times, nothing actually came of it and by 2012 I found myself without and agent, without a career and heavily in debt with a baby on the way. Five years later, after slowly going insane for not being able to make films for so long, I went out and short a short on an iPhone 6s, over three nights for £3,000, almost entirely by myself. And it felt good!
So I would say it really doesn’t matter if you go to film school or not. Both have equal advantages and disadvantages. The key is to consider all options. If you can’t decide then often fate will chose the right path for you. Don’t look at failures as bad and successes as good. See failures as opportunities to learn and successes as a temporary reward.