fbpx

Best Smartphone Cameras for Video 2019 – According to DxOMark Image Labs rating

A few days ago, DxOMark Image Labs announced that the Huawei Mate 20 Pro tops their camera test chart. But this test is an average of the phone’s performance for photos and video. As we’re all about smartphone filmmaking, we are of course more interested in the video performance.

So I have rearranged the table, using only the video scores for each smartphone. There are some surprising changes, with some phones punching above their weight when it comes to video. Why is this important? Because if you are looking at a smartphone primarily for it’s video performance, then there might be some bargains to be found – great video at less cost.

Huawei Mate 20 Pro tops DXOMARK Camera Rating Chart

Owned by DxOMark Image Labs, the DxOMark is a website providing image quality ratings for standalone cameras, lenses, and mobile devices that include cameras. Yesterday, they released their rating for the Huawei Mate 20 Pro.

The firm gave Huawei’s Mate 20 Pro an overall score of 109, meaning it tops the chart level on points with the older Huawei P20 Pro. Apple’s iPhone XS Max is the next best device according to DxOMark, four points behind the duo.

Here’s the top of the chart.

dxomark chart january 2019

As I said, the score is the average of the still photo and video performance. The company gave the Mate 20 Pro a photo score of 114 and a video score of 97. However, when it comes to the top phones video performance, there’s very little difference between the Huawei’s Mate 20 Pro and the the Apple iPhone XS Max, which has a video score of 96 – only one point behind.

So if you take only the video score from DxOMark, things look a bit different…

DxOMark Table By Video Score

101 – (NEW) Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G

99 – Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus

98 – Google Pixel 3

98 – Google Pixel 2

98 – Huawei P20 Pro

97 – (NEW) Honor 20 Pro

97 – (NEW) Samsung S10

97 – (NEW) Huawei P30 Pro

97 – Huawei Mate 20 Pro

96 – iPhone XS Max

96 – iPhone XR

95 – Google Pixel 3a

95 – HTC U12+

94 – Samsung Galaxy Note 9

94 – Huawei P20

93 – Xiaomi Mi MIX 3

91 – Huawei Mate 10 Pro

91 – OnePlus 6T

91 – Google Pixel

90 – NEW Xiaomi Pocophone F1

90 – iPhone 8

90 – Vivo X20 Plus

89 – iPhone X

89 – iPhone 8+

88 – Xiaomi Mi 8

88 – Xiaomi Mi MIX 2S

88 – General Mobile GM 9 Pro

87 – OnePlus 6

86 – Asus ZenFone 5

86 – Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

86 – Crosscall Trekker-X4

85 – Smartisan Pro 2S

85 – iPhone 7

84 – Sony Xperia 1

84 – Samsung Galaxy Note 8

84 – iPhone 7 Plus

84 – HTC U11

84 – Xiaomi Mi Note 3

84 – Sony Xperia XZ Premium

83 – Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge

82 – Nokia 8 Sirocco

80 – Google Nexus 6P

79 – LG G7 ThinQ

78 – iPhone 6

78 – Motorola Moto Z2 Force

75 – Archos Diamond Omega

75 – Samsung Galaxy S5

74 – Samsung Galaxy A8

74 – Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra

73 – LG V30

68 – Samsung Galaxy J5 Prime

67 – Motorola Moto G5S

66 – iPhone 5s

65 – Meizu Pro 7 Plus

65 – Nokia 808 PureView

65 – Samsung Galaxy J2 Pro

62 – Lava Z25

62 – Nokia 8

60 – Intex Aqua Selfie

58 – Micromax Canvas Infinity

57 – Gionee S10L

56 – Sony Xperia L2

52 – Energizer E520

52 – Reliance Jio LYF Earth 1

What do we learn from this?

Firstly, if you are simply looking for a smartphone which has great video specs, there are some bargains to be had.

Remember that the Sundance break-out hit, Tangerine, was shot on iPhone 5s which only has a score of 66. You can buy a refurbished one for a few $$.

Remember also that Soderbergh used Apple iPhone 7+ phones to shoot Unsane and iPhone 8+ to shoot High Flying Bird.

But the absolutely stand out is the original Google Pixel, which has a score of 91 and can be bought for $183. Yes, according to DxOMark the old Google Pixel is better for video than even the iPhone 8 and 8+ and iPhone X.

The surprise is to find the Samsung S9+ top of the chart and costs a little less than the phones below it. This is pleasing news to me, as I happen to have a Samsung S9 (although this has not been reviewed by DxOMark, I presume it is close if not equal to the plus version). I have been filming my SciFi series with Samsung phones so you can see how I’ve been getting on.

Meanwhile the latest Google pixels and the latest Huawei are close behind, followed by the iPhone XS Max.

Of course, all this depends how much you trust DxOMark’s smartphone video analysis. Because I do find it hard to believe that the original Google Pixel ranks so highly.

Well… actually…

Watch this camera test and remind yourself you can buy one of these phones for $183 (refurbished). Or £142 in UK money.

If you check the description in the video, the filmmaker has put a link to the ungraded version, as well, which is really interesting. He says he “edited in FCPX and graded in DaVinci Resolve. I also used Filmic Pro and the native camera app to record the entire video.”

Below is the same filmmaker – Matteo Bertoli – this time with an iPhone 7+ ($400 refurbished).

Eager to learn more?
Join our weekly newsletter featuring inspiring stories, no-budget filmmaking tips and comprehensive equipment reviews to help you turn your film projects into reality!


    As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.


    Simon Horrocks

    Simon Horrocks is a screenwriter & filmmaker. His debut feature THIRD CONTACT was shot on a consumer camcorder and premiered at the BFI IMAX in 2013. His shot-on-smartphones sci-fi series SILENT EYE featured on Amazon Prime. He now runs a popular Patreon page which offers online courses for beginners, customised tips and more: www.patreon.com/SilentEye

    All author posts

    Privacy Preference Center